Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582508›Full record

Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2024

4CMenB Breadth of Immune Response, Immunogenicity, and Safety: Results From a Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled, Observer Blind Study in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Terry Nolan, Chiranjiwi Bhusal, Jiří Beran, Mark Bloch, Benhur S Cetin, Ener C Dinleyici, Daniel Dražan, Satu Kokko, Susanna Koski, Outi Laajalahti and 14 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Terry NolanVaccine and Immunisation Research Group, Peter Doherty Institute at the University of Melbourne, and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chiranjiwi BhusalGSK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jiří BeranVaccination and Travel Medicine Centre, Hradec Králové, Czechia.
Mark BlochHoldsworth House Medical Practice, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Benhur S CetinDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-4907
Ener C DinleyiciEskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0339-0134
Daniel DražanGeneral Practice for Children and Adolescents, Jindřichův Hradec, Czechia.
Satu KokkoOulu Vaccine Research Clinic, FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University, Oulu, Finland.
Susanna KoskiHelsinki South Clinic, FVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-8475
Outi LaajalahtiFVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University, Seinäjoen Rokotetutkimusklinikka, Seinäjoki, Finland.
Joanne M LangleyCanadian Center for Vaccinology (Dalhousie University, IWK Health and Nova Scotia Health), Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-7345
Mika RämetFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, FVR Finnish Vaccine Research, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5776-164X
Peter C RichmondUniversity of Western Australia School of Medicine and Vaccine Trials Group, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Washington, Australia.
Peter SilasWee Care Pediatrics, Syracuse, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0980-0701
Bruce TapieroCHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Florence TiongAusTrials (Wellers Hill), Tarragindi, QLD, Australia.
Mary TiptonCopperview Medical Center, South Jordan, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3002-521X
Benita UkkonenFVR Finnish Vaccine Research and Tampere University, Espoo Clinic, Espoo, Finland.
Betul UlukolDepartment of Pediatrics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Maria LattanziGSK, Siena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3457-426X
Mauro TrapaniGSK, Siena, Italy.
Arnold WillemsenGSK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6944-4249
Daniela ToneattoGSK, Siena, Italy.
QUINTET study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) strains are highly diverse. Breadth of immune response for the MenB vaccine, 4CMenB, administered at 0-2, 0-6, or 0-2-6 months, was demonstrated by endogenous complement-human serum bactericidal antibody (enc-hSBA) assay against an epidemiologically relevant panel of 110 MenB strains. Methods: In a phase 3 trial, 3651 healthy 10- to 25-year-old participants were randomized 5:5:9:1 to receive 4CMenB (0-6 schedule), 4CMenB (0-2-6 schedule), investigational MenABCWY vaccine, or control MenACWY-CRM vaccine. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and demonstrate breadth of immune response by enc-hSBA assay against the MenB strain panel using test-based (percentage of samples without bactericidal activity against strains after 4CMenB vs control vaccination) and responder-based (percentage of participants whose postvaccination sera kill ≥70% strains) approaches. Success was demonstrated with 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) lower limit >65%. Immunogenicity was assessed by traditional hSBA assay against four indicator strains. Results: Breadth of immune response (test-based) was 78.7% (97.5% CI, 77.2-80.1), 81.8% (80.4-83.1), 83.2% (81.9-84.4) for the 0-2, 0-6, and 0-2-6 schedules, respectively, and (responder-based) 84.8% (81.8-87.5), 89.8% (87.2-92.0), and 93.4% (91.2-95.2), respectively. No clinically relevant differences in immunogenicity were observed across schedules. 4CMenB was well tolerated. Conclusions: The 2-dose (0-2, 0-6) 4CMenB schedules met predefined criteria for success for both breadth of immune response endpoints against a diverse MenB strain panel, had comparable immunogenicity, and safety in line with the established 4CMenB safety profile. The 3-dose schedule provided no additional immunological benefit, supporting use of the 4CMenB 0-2 schedule.

Indexed as

4CMenBbactericidal assaybreadth of immune responsemeningococcal vaccineNeisseria meningitidis

Identifiers

PMID39582508
PMCPMC11584413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.