Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582384›Full record

Trial reportResearch report (Health Effects Institute)2024

Assessing the National Health, Education, and Air Quality Benefits of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's School Bus Rebate Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial Design.

S D Adar, M Pedde, R Hirth, A Szpiro

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Research report (Health Effects Institute), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. How Do Household Energy Transitions Work?Research report (Health Effects Institute) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S D AdarDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health.
M PeddeDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health.
R HirthDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health.
A SzpiroDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health.

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionApproximately 25 million children ride buses to school in the United States. While school buses remain the safest school transport from a traffic accident perspective, older buses can expose students to high levels of diesel exhaust. These exposures can adversely affect health, which might cause missed school days and reduced learning. To hasten the transition to cleaner, lower-emission vehicles, the US Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA) ongoing School Bus Rebate Program randomly allocated over $27 million to replace older, higher-emission school buses with cleaner, lower-emission alternatives between 2012 and 2017. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness of this national program.

methodsLeveraging the randomized allocation of rebate funding, we assessed the impacts of the US EPA's 2012-2017 School Bus Rebate Programs on attendance, educational achievement, emergency department (ED) visits for respiratory causes among children in Medicaid, and community air pollution levels. We analyzed all districts linked to applications with complete data using modified intention-to-treat (ITT) modeling for randomized controlled trials, comparing changes in school-district levels of each outcome, after versus before each lottery year, by funding selection status. We also examined the heterogeneity of effects by model years of the replaced buses and by quartiles of estimated ridership on applicant buses.

resultsOf the 3,019 applications that met our inclusion criteria, 406 were randomly selected for funding. The districts that were linked to these applications were similar in terms of size, demographic makeup, funding requests, and socioeconomic status to the districts linked to applications that were not selected for funding. The districts that were linked to applications selected for funding that replaced the oldest buses had improvements in attendance, educational performance, and ambient particulate matter ≤2.5 µm aerodynamic diameter (PM Based on the attendance improvements observed alone, we estimate that the total investment of $27 million by the US EPA for the 2012-2017 lotteries may have resulted in $350 million of benefits per year, although these benefits could not be distinguished from no benefit. Further investment of funds to replace all school buses manufactured before the year 1990 could lead to an additional $400 million of economic benefits per year and replacing all school buses manufactured before the year 2000 could lead to an additional $1.3 billion of economic benefits per year.

conclusionsWe conclude that the US EPA's School Bus Rebate Program investments to remove very old buses from the fleets have positively affected communities.

Indexed as

Air PollutionMotor VehiclesSchoolsUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyVehicle EmissionsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansUnited StatesVehicle Emissions

Identifiers

PMID39582384
PMCPMC11587696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.