Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582363›Full record

SynthesisGlobal change biology2024

Marine and Freshwater Sounds Impact Invertebrate Behavior and Physiology: A Meta-Analysis.

Hailey L Davies, Kieran D Cox, Kelsie A Murchy, Hailey M Shafer, Audrey Looby, Francis Juanes

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Global change biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hailey L DaviesDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2110-2861
Kieran D CoxDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5626-1048
Kelsie A MurchyDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3034-3488
Hailey M ShaferDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-3763-4457
Audrey LoobyNature Coast Biological Station, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Cedar Key, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1833-8643
Francis JuanesDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-0014

Funding

Fisheries and Oceans CanadaHakai InstituteLiber Ero FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNSERC Canadian Healthy Oceans Network (CHONe II)University of FloridaUniversity of Victoria
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of biotic and abiotic sounds that fill underwater ecosystems has become polluted by anthropogenic noise in recent decades. Yet, there is still great uncertainty surrounding how different acoustic stimuli influence marine and freshwater (i.e., aquatic) communities. Despite capabilities to detect and produce sounds, aquatic invertebrates are among the most understudied taxa within the field of soundscape ecology. We conducted a meta-analysis to understand how sounds from various sources influence the behavior and physiology of aquatic invertebrates. We extracted 835 data points from 46 studies conducted in 15 countries. The resulting data included 50 species, a range of experimental conditions, and four sound categories: anthropogenic, environmental, synthetic, and music. We used meta-analytic multivariate mixed-effect models to determine how each sound category influenced aquatic invertebrates and if responses were homogeneous across taxa. Our analyses illustrate that anthropogenic noise and synthetic sounds have detrimental impacts on aquatic invertebrate behavior and physiology, and that environmental sounds have slightly beneficial effects on their behavior. Defence responses were the most impacted behaviors, while the most prominent physiological responses were related to biochemistry, genetics, and morphology. Additionally, arthropods and molluscs exhibited the most pronounced physiological responses to anthropogenic and synthetic noise. These findings support the conclusion that many invertebrate species are sensitive to changes in aquatic soundscapes, which can cause adverse or favorable consequences to individuals and populations, dependent on the sound source. This quantitative synthesis highlights the necessity of including marine and freshwater invertebrates in acoustic exposure studies, aquatic ecosystem assessments, and emerging noise pollution policies.

Indexed as

Fresh WaterInvertebratesAnimalsAquatic OrganismsBehavior, AnimalEcosystemNoiseSeawaterSoundacoustic enrichmentaquatic invertebratesarthropodsfitness consequencesglobal changemolluscsnoise pollutionquantitative synthesissoundscapes

Identifiers

PMID39582363
PMCPMC11586707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.