ReviewThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi2024
[Serological Markers to Assess Liver Fibrosis and Their Roles].
Review in The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- Differentiating advanced from non-advanced hepatic fibrosis: a hybrid deep learning-radiomics model leveraging synthetic contrast-enhanced CT from CycleGAN.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- The C-reactive Protein-Triglyceride-Glucose Index in Relation to Liver Disease.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic liver disease is a significant public health issue worldwide, with the degree of liver fibrosis and its progression significantly influencing the treatment and prognosis. A liver biopsy is the standard diagnostic method, but it is invasive and presents various issues. Therefore, numerous non-invasive diagnostic methods have been developed. Serum markers are categorized into indirect markers, which reflect liver damage, inflammation, or functional changes, and direct markers, which measure the components released into the bloodstream during fibrosis. In addition, various kinds of formulas that combined direct/indirect markers and demographic variables were developed and validated with encouraging outcomes. Nevertheless, despite their convenience, serum indicators require cautious interpretation because they are affected by a number of factors. More research will be needed to determine if the clinical course of chronic liver disease under a disease-specific treatment could be monitored appropriately using serological markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.