Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582279›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2024

Comparing the effectiveness of different DNA extraction methods in MX-80 bentonite.

Kristel Mijnendonckx, Carla Smolders, Deepa Bartak, Trung Le Duc, Mar Morales-Hidalgo, Cristina Povedano-Priego, Fadwa Jroundi, Mohamed L Merroun, Natalie Leys, Katerina Cerna

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kristel MijnendonckxUnit of Microbiology, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2801-1110
Carla SmoldersUnit of Microbiology, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium.
Deepa BartakDepartment of Applied Biology, Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec (TUL), Liberec, Czech Republic.
Trung Le DucDepartment of Applied Biology, Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec (TUL), Liberec, Czech Republic.
Mar Morales-HidalgoDepartment of Microbiology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Cristina Povedano-PriegoDepartment of Microbiology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Fadwa JroundiDepartment of Microbiology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Mohamed L MerrounDepartment of Microbiology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Natalie LeysUnit of Microbiology, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium.
Katerina CernaDepartment of Applied Biology, Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec (TUL), Liberec, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3351-6372

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 847593SÚRAO SO2020-017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approaches to DNA extraction play a crucial role in determining the variability of results obtained through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Particularly, clay-rich samples can impede the efficiency of various standard cultivation-independent techniques. We conducted an inter-laboratory comparison study to thoroughly assess the efficacy of two published DNA extraction methods (kit-based and phenol-chloroform-based) specifically designed for bentonite samples. To this end, we spiked Wyoming MX 80 bentonite with two different mock communities and compared the obtained DNA yield and purity, the presence of contaminants and the community profile. Our findings suggest that both methods are equally viable, with the best choice depending on the specific requirements of the downstream analysis. However, it is crucial to maintain consistency in the chosen method, as comparing results becomes challenging, particularly in the presence of bentonite. In summary, our study emphasizes the significance of standardized DNA extraction methods and underscores the importance of validating these methods using appropriate controls when studying microbial communities with 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, particularly in environments characterized by low biomass and clay-rich compositions. Additionally, slight modifications to one of the extraction methods can substantially enhance its efficiency.

Indexed as

BentoniteDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacteriaMicrobiotaSequence Analysis, DNASoil MicrobiologyBentoniteDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID39582279
PMCPMC11586505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.