ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025
The clinical utility in hospital-wide use of growth differentiation factor 15 as a biomarker for mitochondrial DNA-related disorders.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Primary Mitochondrial Diseases: Diagnosis, Natural History Studies and Clinical Trials.Genes · 2026Review
- GDF15 orchestrates mitochondrial-immune crosstalk via SMAD7-HIF-1α-PKM2 cascade to attenuate septic liver injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical recognition of primary mitochondrial disorders (PMD) is difficult due to the clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Whereas lactate has low sensitivity and specificity, in structured clinical studies growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) has shown promise with elevations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-related PMD, but its specificity has been questioned. In a tertiary care hospital-wide study, medical records were retrospectively reviewed from 418 cases where GDF15 levels were obtained by clinicians. Patients were classified into patients with PMD due to mtDNA-related defects (mtDNA maintenance, mtDNA deletions, and mtDNA-encoded tRNA variants), PMD due to structural defects or other nuclear causes, and in non-mitochondrial disease. Patients with liver disease or systemic critical illness were excluded. GDF15 was assayed in a clinical laboratory with a cutoff of 750 ng/L. There were 38 mtDNA-related PMD (GDF15 >750 pg/mL in 76%), 35 other nuclear DNA-encoded PMD or structural subunits (31% elevated GDF15), 309 non-mitochondrial disorders (13% elevated GDF15). Based on the highest Youden J-index, the optimal cut-off value to identify these target mtDNA-related disorders was 815 pg/mL, with sensitivity 76%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value of 41% and negative predictive value of 97%. At this optimized cutoff level, mtDNA-encoded PMD patients had elevated GDF15 in 76%, nuclear DNA-encoded PMD in 26%, and non-mitochondrial disorders in 11% of patients. Thus, in a real-life clinical setting, after excluding abnormal liver function and critical illness, GDF15 had good clinical utility increasing the odds at predicting mtDNA-related primary mitochondrial disorders 14-fold, but not for structural or other nuclear-encoded primary mitochondrial disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.