Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582251›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Fast polypharmacy side effect prediction using tensor factorization.

Oliver Lloyd, Yi Liu, Tom R Gaunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oliver LloydMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6436-9446
Yi LiuMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2051-440X
Tom R GauntMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0924-3247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAdverse reactions from drug combinations are increasingly common, making their accurate prediction a crucial challenge in modern medicine. Laboratory-based identification of these reactions is insufficient due to the combinatorial nature of the problem. While many computational approaches have been proposed, tensor factorization (TF) models have shown mixed results, necessitating a thorough investigation of their capabilities when properly optimized.

resultsWe demonstrate that TF models can achieve state-of-the-art performance on polypharmacy side effect prediction, with our best model (SimplE) achieving median scores of 0.978 area under receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.971 area under precision-recall curve, and 1.000 AP@50 across 963 side effects. Notably, this model reaches 98.3% of its maximum performance after just two epochs of training (approximately 4 min), making it substantially faster than existing approaches while maintaining comparable accuracy. We also find that incorporating monopharmacy data as self-looping edges in the graph performs marginally better than using it to initialize embeddings. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code used in the experiments is available in our GitHub repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10684402). The implementation was carried out using Python 3.8.12 with PyTorch 1.7.1, accelerated with CUDA 11.4 on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GPUs.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPolypharmacyAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID39582251
PMCPMC11646082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.