ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024
Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Chemical and Microbial Contamination in Nonurban Floodwaters.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sustainable strategies for hospital wastewater treatment: bioremediation, phytoremediation, and hybrid approaches for emerging pollutants.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During major flood events, waterborne contaminants are relatively poorly characterized. This is due to logistical difficulties associated with obtaining water samples in potentially dangerous flood conditions. Herein, we report analyses of water samples from a large, flooded landscape in Victoria, Australia, during a major flood event. We collected 83 samples from seven rivers and 18 river locations as far apart as 520 km. The sampling campaign covered a 26-day window, with 3 samples taken weekly from each site. Floodwater samples were analyzed for 778 contaminants and 544 microbial species were identified using eDNA. Our study shows that 85 contaminants were detected in floodwaters. Fungicides, phthalates, plant macronutrients, metal(loid)s and PPCPs were better explained by land uses, whereas herbicides and insecticides were explained by a mixture of land use and water flow data. Potentially pathogenic orders with the highest detection rates were Enterobacterales (82.4%), Mycobacteriales (70.6%) and Legionellales (58.8%). Contaminants and microbial signatures responded to rainfall, water flow and water level, demonstrating increased and varied human and environmental risks of exposure during the sampling window. Our work underlines the importance of rigorous and timely monitoring and provides an evidence-base for decision making during increasingly frequent and intense climate driven flood events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.