ArticleScientific reports2024
Deep Kronecker LeNet for human motion classification with feature extraction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human motion classification is gaining more interest among researchers, and it is significant in various applications. Human motion classification and assessment play a significant role in health science and security. Technology-based human motion evaluation deploys motion sensors and infrared cameras for capturing essential portions of human motion and key facial elements. Nevertheless, the prime concern is providing effectual monitoring sensors amidst several stages with less privacy. To overcome this issue, we have developed a human motion categorization system called Deep Kronecker LeNet (DKLeNet), which uses a hybrid network.The system design of impulse radio Ultra-Wide Band (IR-UWB) through-wall radar (TWR) is devised, and the UWB radar acquires the signal. The acquired signal is passed through the gridding phase, and then the feature extraction unit is executed. A new module DKLeNet, which is tuned by Spotted Grey Wolf Optimizer (SGWO), wherein the layers of these networks are modified by applying the Fuzzy concept. In this model, the enhanced technique DKLeNet is unified by Deep Kronecker Network (DKN) and LeNet as well as the optimization modules SGWO is devised by Spotted Hyena Optimizer (SHO) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). The classified output of human motion is based on human walking, standing still, and empty. The analytic measures of DKLeNet_SGWO are Accuracy, True positive rate (TPR), True Negative rate (TNR), and Mean squared error (MSE) observed as 95.8%, 95.0%, 95.2%, and 38.5%, as well as the computational time observed less value in both training and testing data when compared to other modules with 4.099 min and 3.012 s.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.