ArticleScientific reports2024
Source apportionment and driving factor identification for typical watersheds soil heavy metals of Tibetan Plateau based on receptor models and geodetector.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heavy metal accumulation risk and source analysis in soils of antimony mining areas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The identification and quantification of soil heavy metal (HM) pollution sources and the identification of driving factors is a prerequisite of soil pollution control. In this paper, the Sabaochaqu Basin of the Tuotuo River, located in the Tibetan Plateau and the headwater of the Yangtze River, was selected as the study area. The soil pollution was evaluated using geochemical baseline, and the source apportionment of soil HMs was performed using absolute principal component score-multiple linear regression (APCS-MLR), edge analysis (UNMIX) and positive matrix decomposition (PMF). The driver of the source factor was identified with the geodetector method (GDM). The results of pollution evaluation showed that the HM pollution of soil in the study area was relatively light. By comparison, UNMIX model was considered to be the preferred model for soil HMs quantitative distribution in this study area, followed by PMF model. The UNMIX model results show that source 1 (U-S1) was dominated by As, with a contribution rate of 53.31%; source 2 (U-S2) was dominated by Cd and Zn, whose contribution rates are 50.35% and 46.60% respectively; source 3 (U-S3) was dominated by Pb, with a contribution rate of 45.58%; source 4 (U-S4) was dominated by Cr, Cu, Hg and Ni, with contribution rates of 60.58%, 60.07%, 51.58% and 56.45%, respectively. The GDM results showed that the main driving factors of U-S1 were distance from lake (explanatory power q = 0.328) and distance from wind channel (q = 0.168), which were defined as long-distance migration sources. The main driving factors of U-S2 were parent material type (q = 0.269) and distance from Tuotuo river (q = 0.213), which were defined as freeze-thaw sources. The main driving factors of U-S3 were distance from town (q = 0.255) and distance from county road (Yanya Line) (q = 0.221), which were defined as human activity sources. The main drivers of U-S4 were V (q = 0.346) and Sc (q = 0.323), which were defined as natural sources. The GDM results of the 3 models were generally consistent with the analytical results of similar types of sources, especially the results of PMF model and Unmix model can basically verify each other. The research results can provide important theoretical reference for the analysis of HM sources in the soil of high-cold and high-altitude regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.