Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39581917›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2024

A Comparative Genomics Approach to Understanding the Evolution of Olfaction in Cetaceans.

April A Jauhal, Rochelle Constantine, Richard D Newcomb

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

April A JauhalSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand. april.jauhal@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3636-4765
Rochelle ConstantineSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Richard D NewcombThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research, Private Bag 92169, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7307-9755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major evolutionary transitions, such as the shift of cetaceans from terrestrial to marine life, can put pressure on sensory systems to adapt to a new set of relevant stimuli. Relatively little is known about the role of smell in the evolution of mysticetes (baleen whales). While their toothed cousins, the odontocetes, lack the anatomical features to smell, it is less clear whether baleen whales have retained this sense, and if so, when the pressure on olfaction diverged in the cetacean evolutionary lineage. We examined eight genes encoding olfactory signal transduction pathway components and key chaperones for signs of inactivating mutations and selective pressures. All of the genes we examined were intact in all eight mysticete genomes examined, despite inactivating mutations in odontocete homologs in multiple genes. We also tested several models representing various hypotheses regarding the evolutionary history of olfaction in cetaceans. Our results support a model where olfactory ability is specifically reduced in the odontocete lineage following their split from stem cetaceans and serve to clarify the evolutionary history of olfaction in cetaceans.

Indexed as

CetaceaGenomicsSmellAnimalsBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenomePhylogenySignal TransductionBaleen whaleBioinformaticsEvolutionary geneticsFunctional genomicsSensory ecology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.