Disparities and Outcomes of Physical Restraint Use in Hepatic Encephalopathy: A National Inpatient Assessment.

backgroundPhysical restraints may be utilized in patients with hepatic encephalopathy with the intention to ensure patient safety.

aimsDetermine if racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in restraint use for patients with hepatic encephalopathy and determine clinical efficacy of restraints in hepatic encephalopathy.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional retrospective study of hospitalizations for hepatic encephalopathy from 2016 to 2021 using the National Inpatient Sample. Patient race and income were assessed for associations with restraint use and restraints themselves were then assessed for associations with clinical outcomes including mortality. Separate analyses were performed for hospitalizations with and without invasive cares defined as the presence of ICD-10 codes for mechanical ventilation, gastric tube placement and/or central venous catheter placement.

resultsRestraint use was documented in 2.4% of 228,430 hospitalizations. In hospitalizations without defined invasive cares, restraint use was increased in Black patients compared to White patients (aOR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.24-1.98, p < 0.001) while lower income was not independently associated with restraint use (1st vs. 4th quartile national income aOR = 0.98, p = 0.895). In hospitalizations that did not involve other defined invasive cares, physical restraint use was associated with higher mortality (aOR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.20-2.43, p = 0.003), whereas in hospitalizations where invasive cares were employed, physical restraint use was associated with reduced mortality (aOR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.40-0.77, p < 0.001).

conclusionsCareful consideration of the necessity of restraints in hepatic encephalopathy hospitalizations without other invasive cares appears warranted as social disparities in restraint use and increased mortality were both found in this group.