ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
ONDSA: a testing framework based on Gaussian graphical models for differential and similarity analysis of multiple omics networks.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Gaussian graphical model (GGM) is a statistical network approach that represents conditional dependencies among components, enabling a comprehensive exploration of disease mechanisms using high-throughput multi-omics data. Analyzing differential and similar structures in biological networks across multiple clinical conditions can reveal significant biological pathways and interactions associated with disease onset and progression. However, most existing methods for estimating group differences in sparse GGMs only apply to comparisons between two groups, and the challenging problem of multiple testing across multiple GGMs persists. This limitation hinders the ability to uncover complex biological insights that arise from comparing multiple conditions simultaneously. To address these challenges, we propose the Omics Networks Differential and Similarity Analysis (ONDSA) framework, specifically designed for continuous omics data. ONDSA tests for structural differences and similarities across multiple groups, effectively controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) at a desired level. Our approach focuses on entry-wise comparisons of precision matrices across groups, introducing two test statistics to sequentially estimate structural differences and similarities while adjusting for correlated effects in FDR control procedures. We show via comprehensive simulations that ONDSA outperforms existing methods under a range of graph structures and is a valuable tool for joint comparisons of multiple GGMs. We also illustrate our method through the detection of neuroinflammatory pathways in a multi-omics dataset from the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort, involving three apolipoprotein E genotype groups. It highlights ONDSA's ability to provide a more holistic view of biological interactions and disease mechanisms through multi-omics data integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.