Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39581741›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Study protocol of Elective Para-aortic and pelvic versus Pelvic only Irradiation in pelvic node positive Cervical cancer: a multicentric open labelled phase III randomised controlled trial (EPIC Study).

Abhishek Shinghal, Satyajit Pradhan, Supriya Chopra, Ankita Rungta Kapoor, Ankita Gupta, Prachi Mittal, Vinay Saini, Jeevanshu Jain, Sanju Sanju, Akhil Kapoor and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Abhishek ShinghalRadiation Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India abhishek.shinghal@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8247-0608
Satyajit PradhanRadiation Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Supriya ChopraHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2656-1792
Ankita Rungta KapoorRadiation Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ankita GuptaHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Prachi MittalHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vinay SainiRadiation Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Jeevanshu JainHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sanju SanjuRadiation Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Akhil KapoorHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Prashanth GiridharRadiation Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Lincoln PujariRadiation Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Zachariah ChowdhuryHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sudeep GuptaHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6742-6378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe revision of International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics staging in 2018 with recommendations to include cross-sectional imaging and a separate stage for node positive disease have opened a lot of uncertainties in implementing the correct treatment approach in these patients. While studies have suggested higher chances of occult para-aortic lymph node (PALN) even with advanced imaging, especially in pelvic node positive disease which tend to recur after pelvic radiation therapy. This study intends to study these patients and isolate the subset who will benefit most from elective PALN irradiation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an ongoing multicentric phase III randomised controlled trial with a sample size of 274 subjects in two arms (137 in each arm) to determine the superiority of limited elective para-aortic irradiation compared with no irradiation. Arm one includes radiation to the lower PALN and pelvis; Arm two includes radiation to the pelvis. Concurrent chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy is standard in both arms. Patients with cervical cancer and radiologically positive pelvic LNs aged>18 years and<70 years are screened for the study. The primary endpoint of this study is 3-year disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints include 3-year para-aortic recurrence-free survival, 3-year distant metastasis-free survival, 3-year overall survival, acute and late toxicity, quality of life. Translational study to evaluate systemic immune response by FAPI-PETCT (fibroblast activator protein inhibitor positron emission tomography) and assessment of p16, L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) and protein death ligand-1 (PDL-1) expression by immunohistochemistry. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the institutional ethics committee and will be routinely monitored according to standard guidelines. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, presented at conferences and submitted to regulatory authorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered on 17 January 2022 under CTRI/2022/01/039495 (http://ctri.nic.in).

Indexed as

Lymph NodesPelvisUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedBrachytherapyClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCHEMOTHERAPYGynaecological oncologyPatientsRADIOTHERAPYUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39581741
PMCPMC11590838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.