Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39581735›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Online health literacy resources for people with intellectual disability: protocol for a grey literature scoping review.

Zhenmei Yeap, Jessica Keeley, Rachel Skoss, Susan Hunt, Angela Kickett, Jacinta Saldaris, Thomas Nevill, Jenny Downs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Digital Health Literacy of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review to Map the Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhenmei YeapSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jessica KeeleyThe Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Rachel SkossInstitute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7033-5063
Susan HuntThe Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Angela KickettThe Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jacinta SaldarisThe Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Thomas NevillThe Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jenny DownsThe Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia Jenny.Downs@telethonkids.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-9037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with intellectual disability are at risk of poor physical and mental health. Risks to health are compounded by poor health literacy, that is, reduced capacity to access health services, respond quickly to changes in health status and navigate care pathways. Building health literacy skills is a strength-based way to increase health and optimise the use of healthcare services. The internet is a primary source of health information for many people, including people with intellectual disability and their families. This scoping review will aim to identify and collate online lay healthcare resources available to and developed for people with intellectual disability and their families and evaluate whether domains of health literacy are addressed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. The proposed search strategy has three components. Resources will be identified by (1) reviewing disability organisation websites, (2) searching key disability and health terms in the Google search engine and (3) snowball sampling to identify additional resources through links in identified websites and resources. Resources will be selected if they are freely available, presented in or translatable into English, provide health information and are directed to people with intellectual disability or their family members. Extracted data will include descriptors of the source, format, area of health and targeted age range. Content relevant to domains of health literacy will be documented and gaps in available health information will be identified. Study findings will be presented in narrative, tabular and visual forms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval will not be sought because primary data will not be collected. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed literature, as conference presentations, as a synthesised resource for people with intellectual disability and their families and in summary documents for health service managers and policymakers.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyIntellectual DisabilityInternetConsumer Health InformationHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicDevelopmental neurology & neurodisabilityHealth EquityHealth Literacy

Identifiers

PMID39581735
PMCPMC11590844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.