Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39581686›Full record

ArticleJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2024

Dorsal root ganglia CSF1

Andreea Violeta Grosu, Roxana-Olimpia Gheorghe, Alexandru Filippi, Alexandru Florian Deftu, Manon Isler, Marc Suter, Violeta Ristoiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dorsal root ganglia CSF1Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreea Violeta GrosuDepartment of Anatomy, Animal Physiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Roxana-Olimpia GheorgheDepartment of Anatomy, Animal Physiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru FilippiDepartment of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru Florian DeftuPain Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Manon IslerPain Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marc SuterPain Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Violeta RistoiuDepartment of Anatomy, Animal Physiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9965-7509

Funding

Faculté de Biologie et de Médecine, Université de LausanneInternational Society for NeurochemistrySwiss National Science FoundationUnitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsColony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) is a growth factor secreted by dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons important for DRG macrophages and spinal cord (SC) microglia injury-induced proliferation and activation, specifically released after spared nerve injury (SNI). In this study, we investigated if SNI-induced CSF1 expression and perineuronal rings of macrophages around mouse DRG neurons vary between L3-L5 DRG and with the neuronal type, and if the CSF1

methodsSeven days after surgery, L3-L5 DRG as well as their corresponding segments at the SC level were collected, frozen, and cut. DRG sections were double-immunostained using antibodies against CSF1 and NF200, CGRP or IB4, while SC sections were immunostained using a fluorescent Nissl Stain and analyzed for CX3CR1-GFP microglia number and distribution by an in-house ImageJ Plug-in.

resultsOur results showed that SNI-induced CSF1 expression was common for all subtypes of mouse DRG neurons, being responsible for attracting more resident macrophages around them in a DRG-dependent manner, with L4 showing the stronger response and CSF1

interpretationTaken together, these results contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the connection between CSF1 and macrophage/microglia response after SNI and emphasize the importance of considering L3-L5 DRG individually when investigating SNI-neuropathic pain pathogenesis in mice.

Indexed as

Ganglia, SpinalMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMacrophagesMicrogliaNeuronsAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicCSF1 protein, mouseMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorCSF1macrophagesmicroglianeuropathic pain

Identifiers

PMID39581686
PMCPMC11625985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.