Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39581635›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Maternal mortality following caesarean section in a low-resource setting: a National Malawian Surveillance Study.

Jennifer Riches, Yamikani Chimwaza, Bertha Immaculate Magreta Chakhame, Jack Milln, Hussein H Twabi, Rosemary Bilesi, Luis Gadama, Fannie Kachale, Annie Kuyere, Lumbani Makhaza and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Informing Decision-Making About Caesarean Birth: A Delphi Study to Develop a Core Information Set.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Jennifer RichesDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK jennifer.riches@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-1767
Yamikani ChimwazaDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Bertha Immaculate Magreta ChakhameNeonatal Health, University of Malawi Kamuzu College of Nursing, Lilongwe, Central, Malawi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4924-1385
Jack MillnDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Hussein H TwabiDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Rosemary BilesiReproductive Health Directorate, Government of Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi.
Luis GadamaKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Fannie KachaleReproductive Health Directorate, Government of Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi.
Annie KuyereMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Lumbani MakhazaMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Regina MakuluniMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9368-5456
Laura MunthaliMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1871-6344
Owen MusopoleReproductive Health Directorate, Government of Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi.
Chifundo NdamalaMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Deborah A PhiriMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Louise AfranDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Amie WilsonLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Shakila ThangaratinamDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Abi MerrielDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Catriona WaittDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular & Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Maria Lisa OdlandDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
James JafaliDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
David LissauerDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaesarean section (CS) is the most common major surgery conducted globally, with rates rising. CS also contributes to maternal morbidity and mortality, with increased risks in low-resource settings. We conducted a detailed review of maternal deaths from 2020 to 2022 in Malawi to determine the burden of deaths related to CS, avoidable health system factors, and causes of death associated with this procedure.

methodsData were collected regarding every maternal death occurring across all district and central hospitals in Malawi, alongside facility-level aggregated birth data. Maternal deaths were reviewed by facility-based multidisciplinary teams with subsequent confirmation of cause of death by obstetricians according to international criteria. Logistic regression was applied to estimate the odds of associations of leading causes of death with CS while adjusting for potential confounders.

resultsDespite a low national CS rate, most deaths occurred following CS (51.8%, 276/533). Women who delivered by CS were five times (OR 5.60, 95% CI 4.74 to 6.67) more likely to die than women who delivered vaginally. The leading causes of death following CS were postpartum haemorrhage (26.0%, 68/277), eclampsia (15.6%, 41/277) and infection (14.1%, 37/277). Deaths from pregnancy-related infection were more often associated with CS (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.72). Health system factors more frequently associated with deaths following CS than vaginal birth included 'prolonged abnormal observations without action' (p=0.006), 'delay in starting treatment' (p=0.006) and 'lack of blood transfusion' (p=0.03).

conclusionsWe found a high burden of maternal death following CS in this low-resource setting. Until now, international attention and many clinical trials have been focused on improving the safety of vaginal birth. Our findings highlight the need to ensure the safe and appropriate use of this potentially life-saving intervention to reduce maternal deaths. To avoid the high burden of death following CS we highlight, there is urgent need to develop and trial CS-specific interventions.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionMaternal MortalityAdolescentAdultCause of DeathFemaleHumansMalawiPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyYoung AdultGlobal HealthHealth systemsInfections, diseases, disorders, injuriesMaternal healthSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39581635
PMCPMC11590827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.