ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025
Validity of E-PASS Score for Evaluating Perioperative Minor Complications Associated with Carotid Endarterectomy.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of different scoring systems for prediction of postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is conducted to reduce the risk of cerebral infarction; therefore, a low complication rate is highly required. To predict long-term morbidity and mortality, various scoring systems have been considered; nonetheless, a model that can be utilized to estimate nonmajor temporary complications and minor complications is currently lacking. To evaluate the occurrence rate of perioperative complications in various surgical domains, the E-PASS (Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress) score is employed. This study was carried out to investigate the utility of the E-PASS score as a predictive factor for the risk of minor complications in patients undergoing CEA. The retrospective analysis was performed for 104 consecutive series of CEA procedures carried out at Otaru Municipal Hospital. The correlation between E-PASS and the rate of minor complications was examined. Sensitivity and specificity were used to construct a receiver operating characteristic curve, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for accuracy. Postoperative minor complications occurred in eight cases (7.7%), including six vagal nerve injuries and two pneumonia cases. Three categorical data-preoperative risk score, surgical stress scores, and comprehensive risk score (CRS) -showed a good relationship with the postoperative minor complication. Among them, CRS presented the highest sensitivity and specificity, as indicated by an AUC of 0.68. The CRS cutoff value was calculated as -0.068, with a 1.7% postoperative minor complication rate for those lower than -0.068 and 14.0% for those higher than -0.068. The E-PASS score was effective for evaluating and predicting postoperative minor complications in patients with CEA procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.