ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025
Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting for Carotid Artery Stenosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most previous large studies of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in maintenance hemodialysis patients are old-era, do not describe the types of stents and method of protection, and their effectiveness is unknown. CAS has progressed remarkably, and tailor-made CAS is now possible in hemodialysis patients according to the lesion. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients treated in our institution.We retrospectively investigated the data of patients who underwent elective CAS in our institution between January 2012 and April 2023. Firstly, we verified the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Secondly, the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients were compared with CAS in nondialysis patients during the same period.During the study period, 212 patients with carotid stenosis underwent CAS. Among these, 18 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were identified for analysis. All 18 patients underwent lesion-specific tailor-made CAS. All 18 patients were technically successfully stented with good vasodilation and improvement in stenosis. No symptomatic cerebral infarction occurred within 30 days after CAS. There was no difference between dialysis and nondialysis patients in the risk of symptomatic complications and death occurring within 30 days after surgery. There was a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications not associated with prognosis in the dialysis group (23.1% vs 1.0%, P = 0.0047). No in-stent restenosis (>50% stenosis) and ipsilateral cerebral infarction at 1 year occurred during follow-up.CAS in hemodialysis patients may be safe and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.