ArticleActa biomaterialia2025
Expansion limits of meshed split-thickness skin grafts.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultra-thin elastin-based membranes as an innovative dressing to enhance skin wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Recurrent giant neurofibroma of the posterior neck and upper back with failed primary grafting and salvage reconstruction: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Cell-matrix feedback controls stretch-induced cellular memory and fibroblast activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Split-thickness skin grafts are widely used to treat chronic wounds. Procedure design requires surgeons to predict how much a patch of the patient's own skin expands when it is meshed with rows of slits and stretched over a larger wound area. Accurate prediction of graft expansion remains a challenge, with current models overestimating the actual expansion, leading to suboptimal outcomes. Inspired by the principles of mechanical metamaterials, we developed a model that distinguishes between the kinematic rearrangement of structural elements and their stretching, providing a more accurate prediction of skin graft expansion. Our model was validated against extensive data from skin graft surgeries, demonstrating vastly superior predictive capability compared to existing methods. This metamaterial-inspired approach enables informed decision-making for potentially improving healing outcomes. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Accurately predicting the expansion of meshed skin grafts is crucial for minimizing patient trauma and optimizing healing outcomes in reconstructive surgery. However, current quantitative models, which treat grafts as tessellated trusses of rigid bars, fail to accurately estimate graft expansion. We have uncovered the mechanisms underlying skin graft expansion and developed a straightforward method based on these findings. This method, designed for practical use by surgeons, provides accurate predictions of graft expansion, as validated against extensive data from skin graft surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.