ArticleJournal of autoimmunity2024
Sunscreen use associated with elevated prevalence of anti-nuclear antibodies in U.S. adults.
Article in Journal of autoimmunity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Micronutrients as Mitigators of Endocrine Disrupting Chemical Health Effects: A Scoping Review and Framework for Epidemiologic Studies.Current environmental health reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntinuclear antibody (ANA) prevalence in the U.S. population increased from 1988 to 2012, especially in white and more educated individuals. In adults ages 20-39 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2004 and 2011-2012, ANA prevalence was previously associated with urinary concentrations of a common sunscreen ingredient, benzophenone 3, measured in winter. Spot urines may not capture relevant chronic exposures, thus we examined whether ANA was related to sunscreen use.
methodsIn a cross-sectional study of adults ages 20-59 (N = 416 ANA positive, 2656 ANA negative, by Hep-2 immunofluorescence, 1:80 dilution), we examined associations of ANA with reported sunscreen use when in the sun for 1 h or more. Logistic regression was used to calculate covariate-adjusted prevalence odds ratios (POR) and 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI), overall and stratified by demographic factors, season, and vitamin D. We explored associations and joint effects with other sun protective behaviors and sunburn in the past 12 months.
resultsThe association of ANA with sunscreen differed by age (interaction p = 0.004): for ages 20-39, we saw an exposure response (POR 2.61, 95 % CI 1.50, 4.24 for using sunscreen always or most of the time, and POR 1.85; 1.12, 3.05 for less frequent versus never-use; trend p < 0.001). These associations were more apparent in females (interaction p = 0.082), non-Hispanic white and black participants (vs. other race/ethnicity, interaction p = 0.023), and those with sufficient serum vitamin D (≥50 vs. <50 nmol/L, interaction p = 0.001). ANA was not associated with other protective behaviors and not confounded or modified by these behaviors or recent sunburn.
conclusionsThese cross-sectional findings showed frequent sunscreen was associated with ANA in younger adults, supporting the need for replication, and longitudinal studies with detailed exposure histories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.