ArticleTalanta2025
High-efficient white blood cell separation from whole blood using cascaded inertial microfluidics.
Article in Talanta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Consecutive Separation Strategy Using a 3D-Printed Microfluidic Chip to Achieve High-Purity White Blood Cells From Blood.Electrophoresis · 2026Article
- An inertial-acoustofluidic platform for bioanalysis: concurrent, high-precision, high-throughput separation of cells and bacteria.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Exploiting Device Deformability for Fluid and Particle Manipulation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
White blood cells (WBCs) are a crucial component of the human immune system. WBCs contain invaluable information about the health status of the human body. Therefore, separating WBCs is indispensable for the diagnosis of many diseases in clinical setting. The low ratio of WBCs to red blood cells in whole blood has made the isolation of WBCs challenging. As the conventional single-stage microfluidic technology cannot provide sufficient separation purity. We used a cascaded inertial microfluidic chip by consecutively connecting two sinusoidal channels to enhance the purity of WBCs after single processing. The improvement was in part due to the diversion of the sample at the end of the first stage separation, resulting in a lower flow rate in the second stage of processing within the cascaded device. We embedded concave micro-obstacles in sinusoidal channels to adjust their effective working flow rate range and enable the proper operation of both channels simultaneously. Using polystyrene beads mixture (5 and 10 μm) with a primary ratio of 1000 to 1, a single processing step through our cascaded chip improved the purity of 10-μm particles with more than three orders of magnitude of enrichment (from 0.08 % to 99.83 %) with a flow rate of 560 μL/min (Re = 77). Using diluted whole blood ( × 1/10), we achieved 307-fold enrichment of WBCs (0.14 %-43.017 %) in a single process which was accompanied with ∼3 orders of magnitude background removal of RBCs (from 4.8 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.