Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39580795›Full record

ArticleMicroscopy research and technique2025

Dealing with Missing Angular Sections in NanoCT Reconstructions of Low Contrast Polymeric Samples Employing a Mechanical In Situ Loading Stage.

Rafaela Debastiani, Chantal Miriam Kurpiers, Enrico Domenico Lemma, Ben Breitung, Martin Bastmeyer, Ruth Schwaiger, Peter Gumbsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microscopy research and technique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rafaela DebastianiInstitute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4396-8612
Chantal Miriam KurpiersInstitute for Applied Materials - Mechanics of Materials and Interfaces, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Enrico Domenico LemmaZoological Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Ben BreitungInstitute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Martin BastmeyerZoological Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Ruth SchwaigerInstitute of Energy and Climate Research - Microstructure and Properties of Materials (IEK-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8940-2361
Peter GumbschInstitute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-StiftungDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While in situ experiments are gaining importance for the (mechanical) assessment of metamaterials or materials with complex microstructures, imaging conditions in such experiments are often challenging. The lab-based computed tomography system Xradia 810 Ultra allows for the in situ (time-lapsed) mechanical testing of samples. However, the in situ loading setup of this system limits the image acquisition angle to 140°. For low contrast polymeric materials, this limited acquisition angle leads to regions of low information gain, thus preventing an accurate reconstruction of the data using a filtered back projection algorithm resulting in erroneous microstructures. Here, we demonstrate how the information gain can be improved by selecting an appropriate position of the sample. A low contrast polymeric tetrahedral microlattice sample and a structured sample with specific markers, both scanned over 140° and 180°, demonstrate that the missing structural details in the 140° reconstruction are limited to an angular wedge of about 20°. Depending on the sample geometry and microstructure, applying simple strategies for the in situ experiments allows accurate reconstruction of the data. For the tetrahedral microlattice, a simple rotation of the sample by 90° rotates all relevant surfaces by about 30° to the original illumination direction, creating a more even X-ray illumination for all the projections, thus providing enough X-ray absorption for an accurate reconstruction of the geometry.

Indexed as

in situ imagingin situ mechanical testinglimited anglelow contrast samplesnanoCTX‐ray microscope

Identifiers

PMID39580795
PMCPMC11842943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.