ArticleTransfusion2025
Plasma exchange using peripheral arterial and venous access in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plasma exchange using peripheral arterial and venous access in the pediatric intensive care unit.Transfusion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTherapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a vital therapeutic modality in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) for various indications. Traditionally, pediatric TPE is performed via a large bore, double lumen catheter, whose insertion necessitates deep sedation, and poses risk of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Building on our previous success utilizing percutaneous radial artery catheters (ALs) for apheresis procedures, we present our experience with ALs for TPE procedures in the PICU.
methodsA retrospective cohort study, conducted in the PICU of a tertiary, university affiliated pediatric hospital, including all children aged 19 years and younger, who underwent TPE using an AL for vascular access, between 2018 and 2023. TPE procedures were evaluated for utility (the procedure was performed as planned) and safety.
resultsA total of 72 procedures were performed on 20 children, using ALs for inlet access and peripheral intra-venous catheters for blood return. Procedure success rate was 94%, with AL malfunction causing transient delays in 6%. All were successfully completed following AL replacement. ALs were mostly 20 and 22 gauge, predominantly located in the radial artery. AL gauge did not significantly affect flow rate or procedure duration.
conclusionsOur findings support AL use for vascular access, as a viable alternative to the traditional large bore, double lumen catheters most often used for TPE in children. Benefits of AL use may include a decrease in sedation requirements and a lower risk of vascular complications. Further investigation is warranted, for consideration as routine practice in PICUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.