ArticleMolecular psychiatry2025
Disruption of macroscale functional network organisation in patients with frontotemporal dementia.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A rostral prefrontal mediolateral gradient predicts creativity in frontotemporal dementia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Cellular signatures underlying functional resilience in presymptomatic frontotemporal dementia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Cortical gradient compression links cognition and transcriptomic signatures in primary angle-closure glaucoma.Communications biology · 2026Article
- A deformable attractor manifold organizes human resting-state brain dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multi-dimensional EEG analysis reveals distinct neurophysiological patterns in Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Non-invasive brain stimulation in frontotemporal dementia: syndrome-specific signals and priorities for future trials.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Network hierarchy in Alzheimer's and Lewy body spectrum disorders: functional gradients, cognitive phenotypes, and translational gaps.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Brain Topology Disruption in Early-Onset Dementia: Review of Current Findings and the Need for Network Resilience Focused Models.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- Explore brain-inspired machine intelligence for connecting dots on graphs through holographic blueprint of oscillatory synchronization.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The predictive value of social cognition assessment for 1-year follow-up functional outcomes in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Structural and functional connectivity in tau mutation carriers: from presymptomatic to symptomatic frontotemporal dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Disruption of structural connectome hierarchy in age-related hearing loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurodegenerative dementias have a profound impact on higher-order cognitive and behavioural functions. Investigating macroscale functional networks through cortical gradients provides valuable insights into the neurodegenerative dementia process and overall brain function. This approach allows for the exploration of unimodal-multimodal differentiation and the intricate interplay between functional brain networks. We applied cortical gradients mapping to resting-state functional MRI data of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) (behavioural-bvFTD, non-fluent and semantic) and healthy controls. In healthy controls, the principal gradient maximally distinguished sensorimotor from default-mode network (DMN) and the secondary gradient visual from salience network (SN). In all FTD variants, the principal gradient's unimodal-multimodal differentiation was disrupted. The secondary gradient, however, showed widespread disruptions impacting the interactions among all networks specifically in bvFTD, while semantic and non-fluent variants exhibited more focal alterations in limbic and sensorimotor networks. Additionally, the visual network showed responsive and/or compensatory changes in all patients. Importantly, these disruptions extended beyond atrophy distribution and related to symptomatology in patients with bvFTD. In conclusion, optimal brain function requires networks to operate in a segregated yet collaborative manner. In FTD, our findings indicate a collapse and loss of differentiation between networks not solely explained by atrophy. These specific cortical gradients' fingerprints could serve as a functional signature for identifying early changes in neurodegenerative diseases or potential compensatory processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.