ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2025
Focal therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasound with intraoperative prostate compression for patients with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center prospective study with 7 year experience.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07757490 (SONAFUSION Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SONAFUSION Registry (Long-term Evaluation of Sonablate High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transurethral prostate resection with high-intensity focused ultrasound achieves a superior functional outcome in prostate cancer patients.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- MR Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy and Primary Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- Prostate Cancer Treatment: Cryoablation in Context.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: State of the Art, Physical Principles, Potentials, and Challenges.Cancers · 2026Review
- Irreversible electroporation for localized prostate cancer: risk-stratified oncologic outcomes and functional preservation.Prostate international · 2026Article
- Editorial Comments to Impact of Approach Routes in MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy on Post-Biopsy Complications: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- Article
- Emerging role of the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination technique in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy amidst the diversification of treatment strategies for localized prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Frontiers of Ultrasound Technology in Prostate Cancer Treatment.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate clinical outcomes of focal therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with intraoperative prostate compression for patients with localized prostate cancer (PC).
methodsPatients were included if they had prostate specific antigen levels of ≤20 ng/mL and clinically significant PC (CSPC) within the left or right half, or upper or lower half of the prostate. CSPC was detected using magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided target biopsy and a 12-core systematic biopsy. Focal therapy using HIFU with intraoperative prostate compression was administered to lesions visible on the magnetic resonance imaging. Biochemical failure was defined by the Phoenix ASTRO definition. Pathological failure was defined as having CSPC in the biopsy at the time of biochemical failure.
resultsThe patients (n = 240; median age, 69 years old; median prostate specific antigen level, 6.42 ng/mL) were divided according to the D'Amico risk classification into: 'low' (n = 51), 'intermediate' (n = 107), and 'high' (n = 82) groups. The biochemical and the pathological disease-free survival rates after a single treatment for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 93.7% and 92.2%, 88.5% and 91.6%, and 84.8% and 86.6%, respectively. The radical or systematic treatment-free survival rates were 96.1%, 94.4%, and 95.1%, respectively. Median follow-up period was 48 months (range 24-84). The urinary and sexual function at 1 month post-treatment had deteriorated but returned to preoperative levels at 3 or 6 months after treatment.
conclusionsFocal therapy using HIFU with intraoperative prostate compression would improve medium-term oncological outcomes without the risk of functional deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.