Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39580597›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Characterization of a widespread sugar phosphate-processing bacterial microcompartment.

Matthew E Dwyer, Markus Sutter, Cheryl A Kerfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew E DwyerMSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0690-564X
Markus SutterMSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6290-4820
Cheryl A KerfeldMSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. ckerfeld@lbl.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-9977-8482

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-FG02-91ER20021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many prokaryotes form Bacterial Microcompartments (BMCs) that encapsulate segments of specialized metabolic pathways to enhance catalysis. The various functions of metabolosomes, catabolic BMCs, are dictated by the signature enzyme that processes initial substrates of the confined pathway. The components and native functions of several metabolosomes have been experimentally characterized; however one of the most prevalent across all bacteria has yet to be studied. Sugar Phosphate Utilizing (SPU) BMC loci encode enzymes predicted to be involved in sugar phosphate metabolism. The SPU genetic loci are found in organisms occupying habitats ranging from soils to hot springs, highlighting the ubiquity of the SPU BMC. We bioinformatically characterized seven SPU subtypes, all which contain an enzyme unique to SPU BMCs, a deoxyribose 5-phosphate aldolase (DERA). Here, we define the fundamental characteristics of SPU BMCs and have expressed, purified, and characterized a set of SPU core enzymes. These include a protein-protein complex formed between a SPU BMC DERA and a predicted ribose 5-phosphate isomerase. Further, we show that the SPU BMC DERA is catalytically active and propose that it acts as the universal signature enzyme for the SPU BMC, with implications for fundamental understanding and biotechnological applications of SPU BMCs.

Indexed as

Aldehyde-LyasesBacterial ProteinsSugar PhosphatesAldose-Ketose IsomerasesBacteriaMetabolic Networks and PathwaysAldehyde-LyasesAldose-Ketose IsomerasesBacterial Proteinsdeoxyribose-phosphate aldolaseribosephosphate isomeraseSugar Phosphates

Identifiers

PMID39580597
PMCPMC11585597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.