Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39580587›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Functional and pathogenic insights into CNNM4 variants in Jalili syndrome.

Khanti Rattanapornsompong, Mawika Rinkrathok, Kanokwan Sriwattanapong, Vorasuk Shotelersuk, Thantrira Porntaveetus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khanti RattanapornsompongCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Mawika RinkrathokCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Kanokwan SriwattanapongCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Vorasuk ShotelersukCenter of Excellence for Medical Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Thantrira PorntaveetusCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. thantrira.p@chula.ac.th.

Funding

Health Systems Research Institute 64-124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Jalili syndrome, an autosomal recessive disorder causing cone-rod dystrophy and amelogenesis imperfecta, is a rare genetic disorder impacting visual and dental development. Missense variants (c.1474G > T and c.1475G > A) previously identified in patients with Jalili syndrome have been linked to functional impairment of CNNM4, however, the biological consequences of these pathogenic variants remain largely unexplored. In this study, we investigated the functional implications of these CNNM4 missense variants, which correspond to p.(Gly492Cys) and p.(Gly492Asp) substitutions within the CBS domain of the CNNM4 protein. Our findings demonstrated that these variants exhibit significantly reduced protein stability and increased mRNA decay rates compared with wild type. Despite exhibiting normal Mg

Indexed as

Amelogenesis ImperfectaMagnesiumProtein StabilityRNA StabilityCation Transport ProteinsCone-Rod DystrophiesHEK293 CellsHumansMutation, MissenseRetinitis PigmentosaRNA, MessengerCation Transport ProteinsCNNM4 protein, humanMagnesiumRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID39580587
PMCPMC11585565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.