SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Relationship of anatomical variations of sphenoid sinus and the outcomes of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgeries: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe sphenoid sinus features many anatomical variations between individuals from different populations in the world. The understanding of these variations is important for the surgeons to plan for surgeries which involve intervention through the nasal approach. The aim of the present systematic review was to perform a qualitative synthesis of available studies which assess the effect of sphenoid sinus (SS) anatomical variations on the outcomes of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgeries (ETSS).
methodsThe current review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic advanced electronic search was performed in four databases Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science (WoS) and Lilacs in December 2023. Studies that assessed the anatomical variations of the SS that affect the outcomes of ETSS were eligible for inclusion. A qualitative synthesis of the methodology and results of the included studies was carried out. Quality assessment was performed using the National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool (last accessed on December 24, 2023).
resultsA total of 14 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most of the studies included in the review found that the sellar pneumatization was the commonest followed by the postsellar type. Single intersphenoid sinus septum (ISS) was found to be the most common variation, which is more frequently found in males compared to females. There was sex difference seen in the attachment of the ISS to the carotid canal. It is more commonly attached to the posterolateral wall of the sinus in males compared to the females. Though complicated cases were less compared to uncomplicated ones, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was the leading post operative complication amongst the complicated cases and paranasal sinus (PNS) computed tomography (CT) scan showed ISS findings differed from intraoperative findings.
conclusionIt is concluded that the ISS poses the commonest anatomical variations encountered during the ETSS. During planning for transsphenoidal endoscopic procedure, the ISS should thoroughly be assessed to minimize potential surgical complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39580556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.