ArticleCommunications medicine2024
Early nasal microbiota and subsequent respiratory tract infections in infants with cystic fibrosis.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-transcriptomic analysis of human nasal transcriptome and microbiome reveals host-bacteria associations in symptomatic respiratory infection.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Point of Care Testing, Rapid Next Generation Sequencing and Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric and Neonatal Healthcare: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Airway Microbiome in Children with Cystic Fibrosis: A Review of Microbial Shifts and Therapeutic Impacts.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespiratory tract infections (RTIs) drive lung function decline in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). While the respiratory microbiota is clearly associated with RTI pathogenesis in infants without CF, data on infants with CF is scarce. We compared nasal microbiota development between infants with CF and controls and assessed associations between early-life nasal microbiota, RTIs, and antibiotic treatment in infants with CF.
methodsWe included 50 infants with CF and 30 controls from two prospective birth cohorts followed throughout the first year of life. We collected 1511 biweekly nasal swabs and analyzed the microbiota after amplifying the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. We conducted structured weekly interviews to assess respiratory symptoms and antibiotic treatment. We calculated generalized additive mixed models and permutational analysis of variance.
resultsHere, we show that the nasal microbiota is already altered before the first RTI or antibiotic treatment in infants with CF. Microbiota diversity differs between infants with CF and controls following RTIs and/or antibiotic treatment. CF infants with lower α-diversity have a higher number of subsequent RTIs.
conclusionsEarly nasal microbiota alterations may reflect predisposition or predispose to RTIs in infants with CF, and further change after RTIs and antibiotic treatment. This highlights the potential of targeting the nasal microbiota in CF-related RTI management, while also questioning current practices in the era of novel modulator therapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.