Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39580536›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

AI-Based model for site-selecting earthquake emergency shelters.

Amirmasoud Amiran, Behrouz Behnam, Sanaz Seyedin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amirmasoud AmiranDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Behrouz BehnamDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. behrouz.behnam@uqconnect.edu.au.
Sanaz SeyedinDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this research is to develop an AI-based model that provides a map of potential emergency shelters for seismic-prone regions. While the predominant approach for locating emergency shelters involves expert-answered questionnaires, their accuracy has often been criticized globally. To address this, machine learning can enhance the speed and accuracy of shelter site selection; the results can also be generalized to other regions. Support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), logistic regression (LR), gaussian processes classifier (GPC), and artificial neural network (ANN) methods are used to develop the model here. These algorithms are trained using maps of emergency shelters in San Francisco, enabling the resulting model to automatically provide potential emergency shelter maps not only for the studied case but also for cities with similar criteria. Except for LR, the other algorithms achieved F1 scores between 0.7 and 1.0 in selecting emergency shelter sites. The model developed in this research can serve as a reliable tool for disaster management planners in managing emergency shelters for people affected by earthquakes.

Indexed as

Disaster managementEarthquakeMachine learningPreparednessSite-selecting emergency shelters

Identifiers

PMID39580536
PMCPMC11585592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.