Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39580516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Template-based modeling of insect odorant receptors outperforms AlphaFold3 for ligand binding predictions.

Amara Jabeen, John Graham Oakeshott, Siu Fai Lee, Shoba Ranganathan, Phillip W Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Decoding channel pore dynamics mechanism inBioinformatics advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Accelerating Ligand Discovery for Insect Odorant Receptors.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amara JabeenApplied BioSciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. amara.jabeen@mq.edu.au.
John Graham OakeshottApplied BioSciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Siu Fai LeeApplied BioSciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Shoba RanganathanApplied BioSciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Phillip W TaylorApplied BioSciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects rely on odorant receptors (ORs) to detect and respond to volatile environmental cues, so the ORs are attracting increasing interest as potential targets for pest control. However, experimental analysis of their structures and functions faces significant challenges. Computational methods such as template-based modeling (TBM) and AlphaFold3 (AF3) could facilitate the structural characterisation of ORs. This study first showed that both models accurately predicted the structural fold of MhOR5, a jumping bristletail OR with known experimental 3D structures, although accuracy was higher in the extracellular region of the protein and binding mode of their cognate ligands with TBM. The two approaches were then compared for their ability to predict the empirical binding evidence available for OR-odorant complexes in two economically important fruit fly species, Bactrocera dorsalis and B. minax. Post-simulation analyses including binding affinities, complex and ligand stability and receptor-ligand interactions (RLIs) revealed that TBM performed better than AF3 in discriminating between binder and non-binder complexes. TBM's superior performance is attributed to hydrophobicity-based helix-wise multiple sequence alignment (MSA) between available insect OR templates and the ORs for which the binding data were generated. This MSA identified conserved residues and motifs which could be used as anchor points for refining the alignments.

Indexed as

Protein BindingReceptors, OdorantAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding SitesInsect ProteinsLigandsModels, MolecularInsect ProteinsLigandsReceptors, OdorantBactroceraMolecular dockingMolecular dynamicsReceptor-ligand interactionsTransmembrane proteins

Identifiers

PMID39580516
PMCPMC11585542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.