ArticleScientific reports2024
Effects of additional weight-bearing on the in vivo kinematics of the human ankle joint complex during walking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effects of Ankle Versus Plantar Vibrotactile Orthoses on Joint Position Sense and Postural Control in Individuals with Functional Ankle Instability: A Pilot Randomized Trial.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Subject-specific kinematic analysis of a total ankle arthroplasty implant.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Effect of heel height on lower limb biomechanics during stair descent in young women: a laboratory study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- New insights into chronic ankle instability: anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies focusing on the kinematics of the ankle joint complex (AJC) have long been a key area of interest for biomechanists and orthopedic surgeons. However, it is not clear how additional weight-bearing walking affects the motion of the AJC compared to walking with a normal body weight (BW) or what adjustments the AJC would instinctively make to accommodate the additional load. To address this gap in knowledge, advanced dynamic biplane radiography combined with a model-based 2D-3D tracking technique was employed to elucidate the inherent kinematics of the AJC during the stance phase while walking with and without additional weight-bearing. It was found that walking with additional 50% body weight (BW + 50%) resulted in a greater dispersion of instantaneous axes of rotation in the talocrural and subtalar joints during the stance phase of gait. The talocrural joint is more plantarflexed and anteriorly translated during the early and late stance phases than during the midstance phases, which suggests that additional weight-bearing affects the stability of the AJC. Moreover, walking with BW + 50% showed that the center of rotation of the talocrural joint was positioned more superiorly and posteriorly during the foot flat to heel-off phase. This, accordingly, increases the ankle-foot gear ratio and the force of the dorsiflexors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.