Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39580471›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

Setting the standard for machine learning in phase field prediction: a benchmark dataset and baseline metrics.

Laura Hannemose Rieger, Klemen Zelič, Igor Mele, Tomaž Katrašnik, Arghya Bhowmik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura Hannemose RiegerDepartment of Energy and Conversion Storage, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, 2800 Kgs, Denmark. lauri@dtu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2986-2937
Klemen ZeličNational Institute of Chemistry, Department of Materials Chemistry, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Igor MeleNational Institute of Chemistry, Department of Materials Chemistry, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-7325
Tomaž KatrašnikNational Institute of Chemistry, Department of Materials Chemistry, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Arghya BhowmikDepartment of Energy and Conversion Storage, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, 2800 Kgs, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3198-5116

Funding

CEREBRAL CHEMISTRY IN DEMENTIA AND AGING--TREATMENTSZ01AG000401 · NIA · AGING · PI SHETTY, H U · 1994 to 1998
–
EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101104022EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 957189The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (ARIS) P2-0401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase field models are an important mesoscale method that serves as a bridge between the atomic scale and the macroscale, used for modeling complex phenomena at the microstructure level. Machine learning can be employed to accelerate these simulations, enabling faster and more efficient analyses. However, the development of new machine learning algorithms depends on access to extensive datasets. This work introduces an accessible and well-documented dataset aimed at benchmarking new machine learning algorithms. We validate the dataset with a benchmark using U-Net regression, a widely used neural network architecture. Although direct comparisons are limited by the lack of existing benchmarks, our model's error metrics are competitive with previous work and generalize across multiple domain sizes. This contribution provides a valuable resource for future efforts in machine learning model development for phase field simulations and demonstrates the potential of U-Net regression, highlighting the scope for novel method development in this area.

Identifiers

PMID39580471
PMCPMC11585596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.