ArticleScientific data2024
Setting the standard for machine learning in phase field prediction: a benchmark dataset and baseline metrics.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transient Anisotropy-Undercooling Coupling in Dendritic Solidification: Grid-Qualified Phase-Field Ensembles and Finite Element Cross Verification.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Setting the standard for machine learning in phase field prediction: a benchmark dataset and baseline metrics.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phase field models are an important mesoscale method that serves as a bridge between the atomic scale and the macroscale, used for modeling complex phenomena at the microstructure level. Machine learning can be employed to accelerate these simulations, enabling faster and more efficient analyses. However, the development of new machine learning algorithms depends on access to extensive datasets. This work introduces an accessible and well-documented dataset aimed at benchmarking new machine learning algorithms. We validate the dataset with a benchmark using U-Net regression, a widely used neural network architecture. Although direct comparisons are limited by the lack of existing benchmarks, our model's error metrics are competitive with previous work and generalize across multiple domain sizes. This contribution provides a valuable resource for future efforts in machine learning model development for phase field simulations and demonstrates the potential of U-Net regression, highlighting the scope for novel method development in this area.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.