ArticlePlant methods2024
AI-powered detection and quantification of post-harvest physiological deterioration (PPD) in cassava using YOLO foundation models and K-means clustering.
Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- YOLO-based high-throughput phenotyping pipeline for soybean nodulation traits in genomic research.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study of post-harvest physiological deterioration in cassava (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-harvest physiological deterioration (PPD) poses a significant challenge to the cassava industry, leading to substantial economic losses. This study aims to address this issue by developing a comprehensive framework in collaboration with cassava breeders.
resultsAdvanced deep learning (DL) techniques such as Segment Anything Model (SAM) and YOLO foundation models (YOLOv7, YOLOv8, YOLOv9, and YOLO-NAS), were used to accurately categorize PPD severity from RGB images captured by cameras or cell phones. YOLOv8 achieved the highest overall mean Average Precision (mAP) of 80.4%, demonstrating superior performance in detecting and classifying different PPD levels across all three models. Although YOLO-NAS had some instability during training, it demonstrated stronger performance in detecting the PPD_0 class, with a mAP of 91.3%. YOLOv7 exhibited the lowest performance across all classes, with an overall mAP of 75.5%. Despite challenges with similar color intensities in the image data, the combination of SAM, image processing techniques such as RGB color filtering, and machine learning (ML) algorithms was effective in removing yellow and gray color sections, significantly reducing the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in PPD estimation from 20.01 to 15.50. Moreover, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based algorithms allow for efficient analysis of large datasets, enabling rapid screening of cassava roots for PPD symptoms. This approach is much faster and more streamlined compared to the labor-intensive and time-consuming manual visual scoring methods.
conclusionThese results highlight the significant advancements in PPD detection and quantification in cassava samples using cutting-edge AI techniques. The integration of YOLO foundation models, alongside SAM and image processing methods, has demonstrated promising precision even in scenarios where experts struggle to differentiate closely related classes. This AI-powered model not only effectively streamlines the PPD assessment in the pre-breeding pipeline but also enhances the overall effectiveness of cassava breeding programs, facilitating the selection of PPD-resistant varieties through controlled screening. By improving the precision of PPD assessments, this research contributes to the broader goal of enhancing cassava productivity, quality, and resilience, ultimately supporting global food security efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.