Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39580413›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2024

The impact of herd age structure on the performance of commercial sow-breeding farms.

Santos Sanz-Fernández, Cipriano Díaz-Gaona, João Simões, José Carlos Casas-Rosal, Nuria Alòs, Llibertat Tusell, Raquel Quintanilla, Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Santos Sanz-FernándezDepartamento de Producción Animal, IC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Córdoba, 14071, España.
Cipriano Díaz-GaonaDepartamento de Producción Animal, IC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Córdoba, 14071, España.
João SimõesUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
José Carlos Casas-RosalDepartamento de Matemáticas, Universidad de Córdoba, Avd. San Alberto Magno s/n, Córdoba, 14071, España.
Nuria AlòsAnimal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA), Caldes de Montbui, 08140, Spain.
Llibertat TusellAnimal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA), Caldes de Montbui, 08140, Spain.
Raquel QuintanillaAnimal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA), Caldes de Montbui, 08140, Spain.
Vicente Rodríguez-EstévezDepartamento de Producción Animal, IC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Córdoba, 14071, España. pa2roesv@uco.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe herd age structure, i.e., distribution of sows within a farm based on their parity number, and its management are essential to optimizing farm reproductive efficiency. The objective of this study is to define different types of herd age structure using data from 623 Spanish commercial sow farms. Additionally, this study aims to determine which type of herd age structure can enhance reproductive efficiency at the farm level.

resultsFarms are classified into three groups according to the quadratic function fitted to the percentage of sows by parities. This classification unveils three types of herd structures: type 1 (HS1) exhibits a concave-downward trend, with a higher percentage of sows in intermediate parities (mean of 45.5% sows between the 3rd to 5th parity); type 2 (HS2) presents a trend curve that is close to a straight line, with a gradual decrease in the percentage of sows per parity (approximately 2% loss of sows census per parity); and type 3 (HS3) shows an upward concave trend curve, with an increase in the percentage of sows in later parities (19.0% of sows between 7th and ≥ 8th parity). Parametric tests assess productivity differences between the three types of herd structures (p < 0.01). HS1 farms have the best productive outcomes over a year, with 31.2 piglets weaned per sow and year (PWSY) and a farrowing rate of 87%, surpassing HS2 and HS3 farms (30.1 and 28.7 PWSY; 85.3% and 83.4% farrowing rates, respectively). HS1 also have the lowest percentage of sows returning to oestrus (11.8%) and the highest number of weaned piglets per litter (12.8), compared to HS2 (13.2% and 12.4 piglets weaned) and HS3 (15.1%, 11.9 piglets weaned). These differences show a medium effect size (η

conclusionsThis study shows the importance of herd age structure on sow-breeding farms as a factor of reproductive efficiency. The results endorse the proposed classification based on the curvature of the trend parabola obtained with the quadratic function to categorize herd structures into three groups. Additionally, these findings highlight the importance of considering the herd age structure in farm decision-making.

Indexed as

Breeding sowsCensus structureParityReplacement rateReproductive performance

Identifiers

PMID39580413
PMCPMC11585933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.