ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Oxford Shoulder Instability Score: cross-cultural adaptation into Spanish and analysis of its methodological quality.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Knee Quality of Life 26-Item Questionnaire into Spanish in Patellofemoral Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) is a patient reported outcome measure designed specifically to assess functional difficulties resulting from shoulder instability. The main aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the OSIS to Spanish. Secondary, it aimed to analyse its methodological quality.
methodsA cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish has been carried out following the recommendations of COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) with a sample of 167 cases of shoulder instability. Inclusion criteria were: subjects with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder with or without clinical diagnosis; aged between 18 and 60. The following psychometric properties were evaluated: validity (construct, internal and external), reliability (internal consistency, test-retest and measurement error), discriminant ability and feasibility. The methodological quality was addressed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist (COSMIN RoB).
resultsThe construct validity obtained an OSIS correlation with the Simple Shoulder Test of r = 0.636 and with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability of r = 0.80. The unidimensionality of the OSIS was confirmed through second-order factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient were both 0.93 (IC95%: 0.91-0.94). Standard error of measurement was 0.70, and the percentage of error and smallest detectable change were 1.46% and 1.94, respectively. No floor or ceiling effects were found. Assessing feasibility of OSIS, the participants answered all questions, had no questions and completion time was: mean 2 min 30 s; SD ± 1 min. Regarding methodological quality, the study showed low risk of bias in the areas of patient selection, index test, reference standard and flow and timing, as well as low concern regarding applicability in the domains of patient selection, index test and reference standard according to QUADAS-2. In relation to COSMIN RoB, all psychometric properties, except for content validity, obtained very good results.
conclusionsThe Spanish version of OSIS offers valid, reliable and feasible functional outcome measures for Spanish-speaking subjects with shoulder instability, based on its psychometric properties and its methodological quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.