ArticleIndian heart journal
Current practices and knowledge of home blood pressure monitoring among people with hypertension: Insights from a Multicentric study from North India.
Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge of hypertension and understanding of home blood pressure monitoring among hypertensive patients in India: results from the GRAND Study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Barriers to hypertension management in a developing country: a qualitative study among patients with hypertension at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHypertension (HTN) management guidelines recommend home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) as an important tool for BP control. Limited data exists on HBPM epidemiology among people with HTN and their caregivers in the Indian context.
methodsThe current study was conducted across three North Indian centres to evaluate the prevalence, training and technique of HBPM among people with HTN and their caregivers. People with diagnosed HTN (>3 months duration) and their caregivers, were screened and their HBPM use was evaluated. HBPM practices were assessed by observing participants measuring BP using a pre-validated, structured 16-point observational checklist. HBPM knowledge was assessed using a 19-point self-administered questionnaire based on the most recent AHA guidelines. Responses were graded and classified based on quartiles.
resultsA total of 2750 participants were screened, of which 2588 (2070 from urban and 518 from rural areas) were included. A total of 468 (18.1 %) were using HBPM. The proportion of respondents using HBPM was 20.5 % (424/2070) in urban, and 8.5 % (44/518) in rural areas. Only 24.7 % (n = 116) of the 468 participants (236 patients and 232 caregivers) using HBPM at home recalled ever receiving training from any healthcare workers. The majority (75.2 %, 352/468) of participants reported learning HBPM themselves through observation, videos, and reading. In HBPM practice assessment, 15.9 % of people with HTN (37/232) vs 5.9 % caregivers (14/236) scored excellent (score >75 %). In HPBM knowledge assessment, 0.4 % of people with HTN (1/232) vs no caregivers scored excellent. HPBM practices were better than knowledge, with mean scores of 62.3 ± 13.1 % and 40.1 ± 16.2 % respectively. Higher education level was associated with improved patient knowledge (p = 0.041), but not practices (p = 0.225).
conclusionsThere is need for more robust training on HBPM to enable people from all backgrounds to better manage their HTN, especially in rural areas. Education is not a barrier to learning good HBPM technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.