Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39579477›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2025

Prophylactic antibiotic use is common in dogs and cats presenting for procedures at veterinary referral dental practices.

Allison C Volk, Stephanie L Goldschmidt, Emma R Bollig, Jennifer A Montebello, Jennifer L Granick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 2025 FelineVMA feline oral health and dental care guidelines.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison C Volk1Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA.
Stephanie L Goldschmidt1Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-5944-4202
Emma R Bollig2Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-5997-3208
Jennifer A Montebello3Arizona Veterinary Dental Specialists, Thrive Pet Healthcare, Peoria, AZ.
Jennifer L Granick2Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-8330-3848

Funding

FDA HHS U01 FD007061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAntimicrobial stewardship is critical for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance. A lack of prescribing guidelines makes overprescribing in veterinary dentistry likely and represents an opportunity for improvement of stewardship practices. This study described prescribing practices of residency-trained and board-certified veterinary dentists for dogs and cats undergoing dental procedures.

methodsAntibiotic-use data were collected from the first 10 patients presenting for a dental procedure at each of 22 participating clinics beginning on October 2, 2023.

results35% of patients undergoing procedures received 1 or more systemically administered antibiotic, most commonly amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin-sulbactam, and clindamycin. Half (43 of 85 [50.6%]) of prescriptions for dogs were for perioperative or postoperative prophylaxis. For dogs, antibiotic duration for prophylactic versus treatment purposes was not significantly different. Common conditions included periodontal disease, tooth fractures, and oral masses. Comorbid conditions were present in 22.3% (49 of 220) of patients. Presence of comorbid conditions was not a risk factor for antibiotic prescribing. Tooth extractions were a risk factor for antibiotic prescribing among patients with periodontal disease, and those with ≥ 11 were more likely to receive antibiotics than those with < 5 extractions.

conclusionsThis study characterized antibiotic use among canine and feline dental procedures performed by residency-trained and board-certified veterinary dentists and identified tooth extractions as a risk factor for antibiotic prescribing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results obtained from this study provide insight into prescribing practices in a referral setting and impetus to develop outcomes-based studies to determine the need for prophylactic antibiotics during specific procedures, especially tooth extractions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCat DiseasesDog DiseasesAnimalsCatsDogsFemaleMaleTooth ExtractionAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic useantimicrobial stewardshipcompanion animaldental proceduresprophylactic antibiotic

Identifiers

PMID39579477
PMCPMC13220159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.