Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39579303›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025

Effects of Heat-Killed Probiotic Strains on Biofilm Formation, Transcription of Virulence-Associated Genes, and Prevention of UTIs in Mice.

Yueh-Ying Chen, Zhen-Shu Liu, Bo-Yuan Chen, Hon-Man-Herman Tam, Wei-Yau Shia, Hsin-Hsuan Yu, Po-Wen Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Antimicrobial Peptide CRAMP-34 EradicatesAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yueh-Ying Chen *Medical Department of Pathology and Laboratory, Yuanshan Branch, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan.
Zhen-Shu Liu *Department of Safety, Health and Environmental Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City, 24301, Taiwan.
Bo-Yuan ChenDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, No.145 Xingda Rd., South Dist., Taichung, 40227, Taiwan.
Hon-Man-Herman TamDepartment of Safety, Health and Environmental Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City, 24301, Taiwan.
Wei-Yau ShiaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, No.145 Xingda Rd., South Dist., Taichung, 40227, Taiwan.
Hsin-Hsuan YuMedical Department of Pathology and Laboratory, Yuanshan Branch, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan.
Po-Wen ChenDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, No.145 Xingda Rd., South Dist., Taichung, 40227, Taiwan. powenchen@nchu.edu.tw.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council grants 112-2313-B-005-037Taipei Veterans General Hospital YSHV 112-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) pose a substantial healthcare challenge, exacerbated by the biofilm-forming abilities and antibiotic resistance of uropathogens. This study investigated the inhibition of biofilm formation (anti-biofilm) and dispersion of pre-established biofilm properties of 18 heat-killed probiotics and their supernatants against four antibiotic-resistant uropathogens: UPEC, Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), Methicillin-resistant Escherichia coli (MREC), and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP). Supernatants from 14 probiotic strains significantly (P < 0.001) inhibited UPEC biofilm formation, reducing it by 20-80%, and also showed promise in removing existing biofilms by 10-60% (P < 0.001). Eight strains significantly (P < 0.05 to < 0.001) inhibited MREC biofilm formation, with four strains achieving 50-80% dispersion. Seventeen strains of heat-killed probiotics directly inhibited UPEC biofilm formation by 10-60% (P < 0.05 to < 0.001), but were less effective against MREC and MRSP (10-50% reduction; P < 0.05 to < 0.001) and had limited impact on KP (10% reduction; P < 0.05 to < 0.001). Notably, heat-killed probiotic like LGA, LGC, LGD, TP-8, and TP-4 showed the most significant inhibitory and dispersion of biofilm activity. RT-qPCR analysis further revealed these inactivated probiotics downregulated genes associated with pili and biofilm formation (fimA, csgA) and upregulated genes linked to quorum sensing (luxS, qseBC, sdiA). Therefore, these findings suggest that paraprobiotic treatment could inhibit the formation of pili and biofilms and promote biofilm dispersion. In an animal model, mice given paraprobiotic formulations I (16 strains) and II (a specific mixture) for 2 weeks showed reduced urinary bacterial load (P < 0.05). Paraprobiotic I notably reduced morbidity from bacteriuria (> 10

Indexed as

BiofilmsProbioticsUrinary Tract InfectionsAnimalsFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMiceVirulenceAnti-biofilmAntibiotic-resistantHeat-killed probioticMice modelParaprobioticUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.