ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Exploratory study on the enhancement of O-RADS application effectiveness for novice ultrasonographers via deep learning.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The performance of sonographic antenatal birth weight assessment assisted with artificial intelligence compared to that of manual examiners at term.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe study aimed to create a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model based on ConvNeXt-Tiny to identify classic benign lesions (CBL) from other lesions (OL) within the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS), enhancing the system's utility for novice ultrasonographers.
methodsTwo sets of sonographic images of pathologically confirmed adnexal lesions were retrospectively collected [development dataset (DD) and independent test dataset (ITD)]. The ConvNeXt-Tiny model, optimized through transfer learning, was trained on the DD using the original images directly and after automatic lesion segmentation by a U-Net model. Models derived from both training paradigms were validated on the ITD for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC). Two novice ultrasonographers were assessed in O-RADS with and without assistance from the model for Application Effectiveness.
resultsThe ConvNeXt-Tiny model trained on original images scored AUCs of 0.978 for DD and 0.955 for ITD, while the U-Net segmented image model achieved 0.967 for DD and 0.923 for ITD; neither showed significant differences. When assessing the malignancy of lesions using O-RADS 4 and 5, the diagnostic performances of two novice ultrasonographers and senior ultrasonographer, as well as model-assisted classifications, showed no significant differences, except for one novice's low accuracy. This approach reduced classification time by 62 and 64 min. The kappa values with senior doctors' classifications rose from 0.776 and 0.761 to 0.914 and 0.903, respectively.
conclusionThe ConvNeXt-Tiny model demonstrated excellent and stable performance in distinguishing CBL from OL within O-RADS. The diagnostic performance of novice ultrasonographers using O-RADS is essentially equivalent to that of senior ultrasonographer, and the assistance of the model can enhance their classification efficiency and consistency with the results of senior ultrasonographer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39579245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.