Trial reportBasic research in cardiology2024
Effect of ventricular fibrillation on infarct size after myocardial infarction: a translational study.
Trial report in Basic research in cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote ischemic conditioning in intensive care: From bench to bedside.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Cardiac rehabilitation in porcine models: Advances in therapeutic strategies for ischemic heart disease.Zoological research · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular effects of lactate in healthy adults: D-lactate, the forgotten enantiomer.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ventricular fibrillation (VF)-induced cardiac arrest frequently complicates ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although larger infarct sizes (IS) correlate with a higher risk of VF, the influence of VF itself on IS has remained poorly investigated. To address this knowledge gap, we analyzed the effect of VF on IS in patients and two experimental models. From a prospective cohort, 30 STEMI patients with VF were matched 1:2 with STEMI patients without VF on the common determinants of IS. The primary endpoint was IS, assessed using the 48-h area under the curve (AUC) for troponin. We also compared IS in pigs with/without spontaneous VF during STEMI (n = 15/group), and in an isolated rat heart model of myocardial infarction with/without electrically induced VF (n = 7/group). After matching, the patient characteristics, including the area at risk (AR), were similar. IS was 33% lower in the VF group compared to the control group (troponin AUC 1.6 [0.5-3.3] 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.