Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39579214›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2024

Adaptation of bacterial natural single guide RNA (tracr-L) for efficient plant genome editing.

Subhasis Karmakar, Debasmita Panda, Deeptirekha Behera, Romio Saha, Mirza J Baig, Kutubuddin Ali Molla

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Subhasis Karmakar *ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India.
Debasmita Panda *ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India.
Deeptirekha BeheraICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India.
Romio SahaICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India.
Mirza J BaigICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India. mjbaigcrri@gmail.com.
Kutubuddin Ali MollaICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, 753006, India. Kutubuddin.Molla@icar.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-7906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageA long tracrRNA (tracr-L), which naturally act as single guide RNA, and its truncated version, Δtracr-L, from S. pyogenes, efficiently induce Cas9-mediated double-strand breaks (DSBs) in plant genomic loci, as demonstrated by in vitro cleavage assay and protoplast transfection. CRISPR-Cas system provides a form of immune memory in prokaryotes and archaea, protecting them against viruses and foreign genetic elements. In Streptococcus pyogenes, this system includes the pre-crRNA along with another non-coding RNA, tracrRNA, which aids in CRISPR-based immunity. In S. pyogenes, two distinct tracrRNAs are produced: a long form (tracr-L) and a short form (tracr-S). The tracr-S regulates crRNA biogenesis and Cas9 cleavage, while tracr-L suppresses CRISPR-Cas expression by targeting the Cas9 promoter to prevent autoimmunity. Deleting 79 nucleotides from tracr-L results in Δtracr-L, which retains similar functionality in gene repression. This study investigates, for the first time, the effectiveness of tracr-L, and Δtracr-L in genome editing within plant systems. In vitro cleavage assays using purified Cas9 and synthesized sgRNAs targeting the Cas9 gene, OsPDS, and the OsSWEET11 promoter revealed that across all target sites, tracr-S demonstrated the highest cleavage efficiency compared to tracr-L and Δtracr-L. For in vivo genome editing, we transfected rice protoplasts with tracr-L, Δtracr-L, and tracr-S, targeting three rice genes: OsPDS, OsSPL14, and the promoter of OsSWEET14. Amplicon deep sequencing revealed various types of indels at the target regions across all three tracrRNA versions, indicating comparable levels of efficiency. This study establishes the utility of both the long-form tracrRNA (tracr-L) and its truncated variant (Δtracr-L) in eukaryote genome editing. These two new forms of tracrRNA provide proof of concept and expand the CRISPR-Cas toolkit for plant genome editing applications, and for eukaryotes more broadly.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenome, PlantRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsStreptococcus pyogenesDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedOryzaProtoplastsRNA, BacterialRNA, BacterialRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR-Cas systemIn vitro cleavage assayLong tracrRNAProtoplastRiceStreptococcus pyogenes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.