ReviewMolecular biotechnology2025
Harnessing Simple Animal Models to Decode Sleep Mysteries.
Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleep-Wake Dysregulation in Human African Trypanosomiasis: From Neuroinvasion to Neuronal Dysfunction.Clocks & sleep · 2026Review
- Examining sleep signals at the cradle of life: can phylogenomic analysis of the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) reveal the fundamental role of sleep?Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Detailed Review of Melatonin and its Role in Managing the Symptoms of Depression.Current molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Studying sleep orthologs in Epsilonproteobacteria through an evolutionary lens: investigating sleep mysteries through phylogenomics.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Mysteries of Sleep: Exploring Phylogenomic Sleep Signals in the Recently Characterized Archaeal Phylum Lokiarchaeota near Loki's Castle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whether it involves human subjects or non-human animals, basic, translational, or clinical sleep research poses significant ethical challenges for researchers and ethical committees alike. Sleep research greatly benefits from using diverse animal models, each offering unique insights into sleep control mechanisms. The fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) is a superior genetic model due to its quick generation period, large progenies, and rich genetic tools. Its well-characterized genome and ability to respond to hypnotics and stimulants make it an effective tool for studying sleep genetics and physiological foundations. The nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans) has a simpler neural organization and transparent body, allowing researchers to explore molecular underpinnings of sleep control. Vertebrate models, like zebrafish (Danio rerio), provide insights into circadian rhythm regulation, memory consolidation, and drug effects on sleep. Invertebrate models, like California sea hare (Aplysia californica) and Upside-down jellyfish (Cassiopea xamachana), have simpler nervous systems and behave similarly to humans, allowing for the examination of sleep principles without logistical and ethical challenges. Combining vertebrate and invertebrate animal models offers a comprehensive approach to studying sleep, improving our understanding of sleep regulation and potentially leading to new drug discovery processes for sleep disorders and related illnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39579174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.