Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39579058›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2024

Incompletely Observed Nonparametric Factorial Designs With Repeated Measurements: A Wild Bootstrap Approach.

Lubna Amro, Frank Konietschke, Markus Pauly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lubna AmroDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8550-7406
Frank KonietschkeInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charitè-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5674-2076
Markus PaulyDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0976-7190

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KO 4680/3-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft PA 2409/3-2Ministry of Culture and Science of the State of Northrhine Westphalia FAIR - Profilbildung 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many life science experiments or medical studies, subjects are repeatedly observed and measurements are collected in factorial designs with multivariate data. The analysis of such multivariate data is typically based on multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) or mixed models, requiring complete data, and certain assumption on the underlying parametric distribution such as continuity or a specific covariance structure, for example, compound symmetry. However, these methods are usually not applicable when discrete data or even ordered categorical data are present. In such cases, nonparametric rank-based methods that do not require stringent distributional assumptions are the preferred choice. However, in the multivariate case, most rank-based approaches have only been developed for complete observations. It is the aim of this work to develop asymptotic correct procedures that are capable of handling missing values, allowing for singular covariance matrices and are applicable for ordinal or ordered categorical data. This is achieved by applying a wild bootstrap procedure in combination with quadratic form-type test statistics. Beyond proving their asymptotic correctness, extensive simulation studies validate their applicability for small samples. Finally, two real data examples are analyzed.

Indexed as

BiometryHumansModels, StatisticalMultivariate AnalysisStatistics, Nonparametricmissing valuesnonparametric hypothesesordered categorical datarank testsrepeated measureswild bootstrap

Identifiers

PMID39579058
PMCPMC11585227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.