SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Maternal and perinatal outcomes of live births after uterus transplantation: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes of live births after uterus transplantation: A systematic review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Restoration of Reproductive Function in Uterine Factor Infertility: Clinical Evaluation of Uterus Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- First European live birth following uterine and adnexal transposition for fertility preservation: a case report and overview of reported neonatal outcomes.F&S reports · 2026Article
- A review of immunosuppressive therapy in the context of uterine VCA and pregnancy.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Review
- Uterus transplantation in the United States: analysis of patients and early postoperative outcomes in the national organ procurement and transplantation network.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Article
- Anesthesia for uterine transplantation.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Review
- Uterus transplantation; first data on neurologic, neuropsychiatric, and physical examination follow-up of children up to 6 years of age.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Observational
- Differences of sex development.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Pregnancy and Delivery After Solid Organ and Uterus Transplantation: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A decade of human uterus transplantation.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Uterus transplantation: A clinical breakthrough after systematic preclinical research.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionUterus transplantation (UTx) is a treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility. The results of pregnancies of this complex infertility treatment should be established. The aim of the study was to systematically review maternal and neonatal outcomes in the pregnancies of women who have undergone UTx. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe population of this review were women that have undergone UTx and delivered child(ren). Cesarean delivery after UTx were planned to be compared with studies reporting maternal mortality/morbidity and perinatal mortality/morbidity after delivery by elective cesarean section without UTx. Systematic literature searches were performed utilizing Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cinahl, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for studies written in English language and published between January 1, 2010, and November 08, 2023. No study design limitation was applied. If no comparative studies were identified, we planned to report the outcomes from the case reports and case series. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using a checklist for case series. The study protocol was registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (registration number: INPLASY202310052).
resultsTwenty-four articles were identified, containing data on 40 unique live births. Multiple publications including same cases were identified and clearly indicated. No comparative studies were identified. The certainty of evidence was very low, as all studies were either case reports (n = 15) or case series (n = 9). All deliveries were by cesarean section and 47.5% of them resulted in emergency cesarean sections. Out of the 21 elective cesarean sections, 52.4% were performed before 37 weeks' gestation. Historical comparison to population data on pregnancies delivered by cesarean section found a markedly increased risk for both the mother and child following cesarean section for UTx. Risks for placenta previa and preterm birth were notably high after UTx; however, some of the later may reflect the results of provider-initiated births.
conclusionsThe maternal and perinatal outcomes of 40 live births post-UTx indicate that these pregnancies may be at high risk of maternal and perinatal complications. Aiming to delay elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks' gestation could potentially reduce some of these risks. Registration of maternal and perinatal outcomes after UTx through quality registries are essential and obstetrical care guidelines for these women should be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.