Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39579025›Full record

SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Maternal and perinatal outcomes of live births after uterus transplantation: A systematic review.

Mats Brännström, Hans Bokström, Henrik Hagberg, Ylva Carlsson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Anesthesia for uterine transplantation.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Differences of sex development.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. A decade of human uterus transplantation.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mats BrännströmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6081-9101
Hans BokströmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0004-8980-4730
Henrik HagbergSahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3962-1448
Ylva CarlssonSahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1414-7279

Funding

Jane och Dan Olssons Stiftelse 2020-09Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse 2017.0363Vetenskapsrådet 2023-02035Vetenskapsrådet 2024-03487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUterus transplantation (UTx) is a treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility. The results of pregnancies of this complex infertility treatment should be established. The aim of the study was to systematically review maternal and neonatal outcomes in the pregnancies of women who have undergone UTx. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe population of this review were women that have undergone UTx and delivered child(ren). Cesarean delivery after UTx were planned to be compared with studies reporting maternal mortality/morbidity and perinatal mortality/morbidity after delivery by elective cesarean section without UTx. Systematic literature searches were performed utilizing Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cinahl, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for studies written in English language and published between January 1, 2010, and November 08, 2023. No study design limitation was applied. If no comparative studies were identified, we planned to report the outcomes from the case reports and case series. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using a checklist for case series. The study protocol was registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (registration number: INPLASY202310052).

resultsTwenty-four articles were identified, containing data on 40 unique live births. Multiple publications including same cases were identified and clearly indicated. No comparative studies were identified. The certainty of evidence was very low, as all studies were either case reports (n = 15) or case series (n = 9). All deliveries were by cesarean section and 47.5% of them resulted in emergency cesarean sections. Out of the 21 elective cesarean sections, 52.4% were performed before 37 weeks' gestation. Historical comparison to population data on pregnancies delivered by cesarean section found a markedly increased risk for both the mother and child following cesarean section for UTx. Risks for placenta previa and preterm birth were notably high after UTx; however, some of the later may reflect the results of provider-initiated births.

conclusionsThe maternal and perinatal outcomes of 40 live births post-UTx indicate that these pregnancies may be at high risk of maternal and perinatal complications. Aiming to delay elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks' gestation could potentially reduce some of these risks. Registration of maternal and perinatal outcomes after UTx through quality registries are essential and obstetrical care guidelines for these women should be established.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleLive BirthPregnancy OutcomeUterusCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyabsolute uterine factor infertilitychilddeliveryinfertilitymaternalmorbiditymortalityneonateperinatalpregnancytransplantationuterus

Identifiers

PMID39579025
PMCPMC11871114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.