ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025
Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: History, Current Status, and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of reducing the contrast dose in infants and children with complex congenital heart disease using virtual monoenergetic images on dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography.Pediatric radiology · 2026Trial
- First- and Second-Trimester Cardiovascular Anomalies in Trisomy 21 Fetuses: Anatomy, Embryology, Genetics and Imaging.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Current foetal cardiology practice in Italian centres: a survey among SICP members.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging findings of tuberous sclerosis complex in fetuses.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Editorial: Unlocking the potential of prenatal MRI: advances in fetal brain, heart, and placenta imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a complementary modality for prenatal imaging in suspected congenital heart disease. Ongoing technical improvements extend the potential clinical value of fetal cardiovascular MRI. Ascertaining equivocal prenatal diagnostics obtained with ultrasonography allows for appropriate parental counseling and planning of postnatal surgery. This work summarizes current acquisition techniques and clinical applications of fetal cardiovascular MRI in the prenatal diagnosis and follow-up of fetuses with congenital heart disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.