ArticlePorcine health management2024
Clinical and pathological characteristics in 214 Danish weaners euthanized because of umbilical outpouchings.
Article in Porcine health management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective pig welfare assessment at rendering plants - a useful tool for monitoring and inspection.Porcine health management · 2026Article
- Umbilical outpouchings in pigs - an international survey on fitness for transport, welfare and management.Porcine health management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUmbilical outpouchings (UO) are common in Danish weaners. In slaughter pigs UOs consist of various pathological diagnoses; however, no studies have assessed the pathology in weaners from randomly selected herds, nor the agreement between clinical examination findings and post-mortem results. The primary objective was to estimate the prevalence of UO-related clinical findings in weaners before euthanasia and the pathologic macroscopic findings after euthanasia. A secondary objective was to assess the agreement between the size of the UO, the presence of ulcers, and the diagnosis before and after euthanasia. Pigs were selected for euthanasia and included in the study because the individual farmer believed the pigs were already unfit for transport, would not make it to slaughter, or would become unsellable.
resultsIn total 214 weaners euthanized due to UOs were examined both clinically and post-mortem. Clinically 65.4% of the UOs were large (≥ 11 cm) and 52.3% were unreducible. In the autopsy 78.5% of the UOs were large, and 54.2% had ulcers on their UO. The most prevalent pathological diagnoses were hernia (36.4%), hernia combined with cysts/abscesses (30.8%), cysts (11.7%), and abscesses (11.2%). Adhesions were found in 32.7%, haemorrhage in 22.7%, incarcerated intestines in 8.9%, and connective tissue related to the UO in 51.9% of the pigs post-mortem. The agreement between the size of the UO in the clinical examination and post-mortem was good, as was the sensitivity and specificity for detecting ulcers in the clinical examination compared to post-mortem.
conclusionHernias were the most common pathological diagnosis in weaners euthanized due to UOs, and many pigs had complications related to their UO such as ulcers, adhesions, haemorrhage, or incarcerated intestines-all conditions that could impact the pig's welfare. The presence of connective tissue in the UO in more than half of the pigs indicated that many of the UOs had been present for an extended period. Clinical identification of the umbilical ring is difficult, but the clinical examination is useful for determining the size of the UO and the presence or absence of an ulcer, both critical factors when assessing a pig's welfare and fitness for transport. Clinical examination, however, has limited value in determining the aetiology of UOs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.