ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
A comparison of patients receiving vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the public and private hospital setting.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Scoliosis Treatment with Patient-Specific Functionally Graded NiTi-SMA Rods: Key Considerations and Development Objectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive and Historical Review of Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Analysis of Research Trends and Hotspots.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Redefining Success and Characterizing Midterm Growth Modulation: Analysis of Radiographic Outcomes in 2 Years Following Vertebral Body Tethering.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVertebral body tethering (VBT) is a new growth-modulating surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) requiring a distinct skillset and intraoperative setup. We compared perioperative details and outcomes of VBTs performed in a public pediatric orthopedic hospital and a general private hospital setting.
methodsWe identified all patients receiving VBT for AIS from 1/2020 to 12/2023 with ≥ 6 months post-operative follow-up, with surgeries performed by the same senior surgeons. Clinical, radiological, and surgical details were retrieved.
results24 VBTs were performed in the private setting and 16 in the public setting. Average age at operation was 11.9 ± 1.1 at a Sanders staging of 3.8 ± 1.2 when the major curve Cobb angle was 50.5 ± 8.0°. Tethered curves were most often thoracic in location (23/40) followed by thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (10/40) and double curve tethers (7/40). Overall correction ratio of 68.0 ± 19.0% was achieved. Time from booking to operation (82.2 ± 39.2 vs 63.1 ± 34.4 days, p = 0.112) and operation time (310 ± 86.4 min vs. 289 ± 87.4 min, p = 0.054) were longer in the public and private setting respectively but failed to reach statistical significance. Time to chest drain removal (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.5 ± 1.7 days, p < 0.001) and length of stay (4.3 ± 0.9 vs. 6.6 ± 1.8 days, p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the private setting, whilst complication rates remained similar (7/24 vs. 3/16, p = 0.456).
conclusionExpertise, resource availability, and costs differ in the public and private healthcare setting. With regards to VBT, the conditions for referral and surgical outcomes remained similar. Earlier drain removal and discharge for patients managed in the private setting was not associated with an increase in complication rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.