ArticleBMC public health2024
Government Digital Transformation and the utilization of Basic Public Health Services by China's migrant population.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between internet use and health among rural-to-urban migrants in China: the mediating role of social integration.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Digital government and residents' mental health in China: evidence on potential mechanisms and urban-rural heterogeneity.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association between China's Tiered Diagnosis and Treatment System and the utilization of basic public health services among migrants.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Health insurance integration and fertility intentions among migrant populations in China: evidence from urban-rural medical reform.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis research delves into the ramifications of Government Digital Transformation (GDT) on Basic Public Health Services (BPHS) utilization among China's migrant populace. Within the framework of escalating digital incorporation into public services, it becomes imperative to assess how GDT initiatives could ameliorate healthcare access for migrants, a group habitually confronted with systemic obstacles. Such scrutiny is crucial for the formulation of evidence-based policies that harness digital innovations to mitigate healthcare disparities.
methodsThe analysis employs data from the 2018 China Migrants Dynamic Survey, matched with details on the National Pilot Cities for Information Benefit to the Public policy at the prefecture city level, yielding a dataset comprising 113,905 observations. To gauge BPHS utilization among migrants, two indicators were developed: the establishment of health records and registration with family doctors. The influence of GDT on BPHS access was estimated utilizing Ordinary Least Squares regression for the initial analysis, incorporating a comprehensive array of individual and household attributes, alongside province fixed effects, to ensure a thorough evaluation.
resultsBaseline regression analyses revealed that GDT is significantly correlated with an enhanced probability of migrants establishing health records and registering with family doctors, with increases of 7.53% and 2.75%, respectively. Subsequent robustness checks, including sensitivity analyses with alternate dependent variables, the Propensity Score Matching method, Double/Debiased Machine Learning method, and placebo tests, further substantiated these findings. Additionally, the analysis explored mechanisms through which GDT facilitates BPHS access, identifying health information accessibility as a significant mediator in promoting healthcare engagement among migrants. Notably, both individual and regional heterogeneity were observed in GDT's impact: female migrants, those with lower educational levels, older individuals, and rural hukou holders experienced more pronounced benefits, while the effects of GDT were also stronger in cities with lower GDP and smaller populations. These findings suggest that GDT is particularly effective in bridging healthcare access gaps in economically or demographically constrained areas.
conclusionsThe outcomes underscore that GDT significantly enhances BPHS utilization among migrants, positioning digital governance as an instrumental mechanism in bridging healthcare access gaps. The observed differential impacts across various subgroups and regions emphasize the importance of customized digital health strategies that cater to the diverse needs of migrant communities. For instance, targeted interventions in lower-GDP or smaller cities could maximize the benefits of GDT in under-resourced areas. Contributing to the body of empirical evidence on digital governance and public health, this research advocates for the expanded deployment of GDT initiatives to foster more equitable health service provision for migrant demographics, promoting inclusivity within a rapidly urbanizing society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.